AMD's Southern Islands GPU line-up was completed 6 months ago with the
launch of the Pitcairn based Radeon HD 7800 series graphics cards. Now with Nvidia launching GTX 650 and GTX 660, it was high time that AMD came back with something powerful. Last week, spec sheets on AMD’s
Radeon HD 8000 series leaked out to the press. The chart shows the two
upcoming graphics cards that would theoretically replace AMD’s HD 7870
and 7850. With leaks like this, there’s always the question of whether or not the data is valid. But One thing is sure AMD is indeed coming up with powerful GPU's and its tiem you take a look at what these devices are capable of(supposedly!)
|
ATI Radeon 8000 Series |
According to various leaked sources and combining commom factors between them, It can be inferred that Sea Islands GPUs will use the Second Generation Graphics Core Next
(GCN2) architecture, and will be built on the same 28 nm process.
Comparing Oland based GPUs with their Pitcairn counterparts, we see a
performance improvement of between 54% and 75%. The
performance of Radeon HD 8870 is comparable to GeForce GTX 680, 30%
faster than the GTX 660 Ti.
These improvements align nearly
perfectly with what we’d expect a next-gen architecture to deliver in
the same price bracket. Memory bandwidth bumps upwards thanks to the use
of faster GDDR5 RAM, pixel fillrates are up slightly, texture fillrates
improve significantly. So, A Powerful device by AMD! Here is complete Specs Compiled from three different sources
| Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon HD 8870 | Difference |
GPU | Pitcairn XT | Oland XT |
Transistors | 2.8 billion | 3.4 billion | +21% |
Die Size | 212 mm2 | ~275 mm2 | +30% |
Base Clock | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz | +5% |
Boost Clock |
| 1100 MHz |
Computing Performance SP | 2.25 TFLOPS | 3.94 TFLOPS | +75% |
Computing Performance DP | 160 GFLOPS | 246 GFLOPS | +54% |
Texture Units | 80 | 112 | +40% |
Texture Fillrate | 80 GT/s | 123.2 GT/s | +65% |
ROPs | 32 | 32 |
Pixel Fillrate | 32 GP/s | 35.2 GP/s | +10% |
Memory Bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 192 GB/s | +25% |
TDP | 175W | 160W | -9% |
MSRP | $349 | $279 | -20% |
|
|
|
|
Radeon HD 8850 had TDP of 130W, identical to HD 7850, and costs 25%
less. All this adds up to a very favorable performance/power/$ ratio
improvement:
| Radeon HD 7850 | Radeon HD 8850 | Difference |
GPU | Pitcairn Pro | Oland Pro |
Transistors | 2.8 billion | 3.4 billion | +21% |
Die Size | 212 mm2 | ~275 mm2 | +30% |
Base Clock | 860 MHz | 925 MHz | +7% |
Boost Clock |
| 975 MHz |
Computing Performance SP | 1.76 TFLOPS | 2.99 TFLOPS | +70% |
Computing Performance DP | 110 GFLOPS | 187.2 GFLOPS | +70% |
Texture Units | 64 | 96 | +70% |
Texture Fillrate | 55 GT/s | 93.6 GT/s | +70% |
ROPs | 32 | 32 |
Pixel Fillrate | 27.5 GT/s | 31.2 GP/s | +13% |
Memory Bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 192 GB/s | +25% |
TDP | 130W | 130W | 0% |
MSRP | $249 | $199 | -25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just because the Radeon 8870 is
specced like a 7950 doesn’t mean it’ll perform like one. AMD will have
tweaked the architecture to improve performance and power efficiency;
the lower TDP is proof enough of that. This data suggests that AMD is
pursuing an evolutionary strategy with the HD 8K GPU.GCN remains an excellent
architecture, and AMD has enough on its plate trying to deal with
bringing new SoCs to market — the company may have chosen a single GPU
strategy to divert engineering resources where they’re needed most. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
About Shaunak
A tech lover who loves writing and sharing with people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment